Methods of Political Corruption in Armenia

Social Science in the Caucasus blog says the methods of corruption in Armenia are “difficilut for non-locals to fully understand”. The blog refers to the analyses conducted by Masis Poghoyan, adressing […]”categories such as “usage of resources available to the candidates occupying administrative posts,” “application of pressure on voters,” “buying/bribing of voters,” “manipulation of public opinion” and “falsification of election results.” […] and provides a link to the research paper on the CRRC-Armenia Web site, which also provides […]”a set of recommendations for combating fraudulent election processes, which include the implementation of legislative reforms, public information campaigns, the provision of consultation/training to voters, and the improvement of the election commissions.” […]

By Artur Papyan

Journalist, blogger, digital security and media consultant

1 reply on “Methods of Political Corruption in Armenia”

Parliamentary Election Monitor
Setting the context for this Parliamentary Election Monitor is an article detailing the political environment for the May vote by RFE/RL’s Emil Danielyan. Writing for the Jamestown Foundation’s Eurasia Daily Monitor, this is one of the few …

Comments are closed.